Linh Dinh: “A Meaningful Assassination Will Galvanize the American People”

Rumble link Bitchute link Linh Dinh , the notable American poet-photographer-essayist, has never shied away from controversy. That’s why he was hounded out of the American literary world and now works from Vietnam (and wherever his peregrinations take him). Is Linh really goading the “angry white pussies" he used to feud with at The Unz Review to consider high-profile political assassinations? Does he yearn to see a white nationalist Luigi Mangione grab the national spotlight? Or is he trolling the AWPs, and us? Watch the interview, make up your own mind, and feel free to drop a comment! Linh Dinh: Look at Israel, man. You know, I mean, how much more arguing do we need? We need to fight. We need missiles. We don’t need protests, man. Protests are useless. And that’s what they want us to think. You know, hold up a sign and something will change. Nothing will change from holding a sign for half an hour on a street corner. That’s what Americans do all the time. You know, they hold a little protest and they go home and they think they did something. They’ve done nothing. You know, you need to fight back. And, you know, in the United States, you can’t vote, you can’t protest, you can’t... You can’t control the media even. You need to do something by force. If it takes an assassination, so be it. A meaningful assassination will galvanize the American people and will wake up these angry white pussies to become real men for once. Maybe one out of ten will act instead of just go online. Kevin Barrett: What kind of scenario could there be where angry white pussies commit an assassination that does something productive for the world? Linh Dinh: Well, okay. I mean, if a meaningful figure is killed overnight, it will wake people up and say, wait a second, you know, these guys are not untouchable because they are untouchable. You can’t reach them, you know? Kevin Barrett: Yeah, I could see the argument maybe for going after certain kinds of very high-level guilty people, right? Like the war criminals, the people who are trying to create a total digital dystopia panopticon, people that Helen of Destroy was talking about on the last False Flag Weekly News, putting flock cameras everywhere, building the data centers. And so, yeah, she was speaking kind of sympathetically, to say the least, of the people who were smashing the flock cameras. And she was hoping that similar means might be used against the data centers. And yeah, I can relate to that. One issue, though, is that a lot of times, once you start admitting that using violence is justified because that’s ultimately what rules the world, so you admit that openly, right? And then the people on your side, you convince them that that’s the case. Well, sometimes what happens is that the stupid people on your side end up committing acts of violence that do not help your cause. They backfire and hurt your cause, and justify the retaliation. The first people who are going to listen to you and commit the violence are the emotional people, the ones who don’t think things through. They are just controlled by emotion. And those people might get all excited… Linh Dinh: And then you have the false flags. Kevin Barrett: Yeah, exactly. You have the false flags, too. And sometimes a combination of the two. Linh Dinh: Fake assassinations, such as what happened with Trump. Kevin Barrett: Yea